|
Computerized Biofeedback Training
AAPB White Paper
Epilepsy
M. Barry Sterman, Ph.D.
The neurological disorder known as epilepsy, a recurrent seizure, is caused
by abnormal electrical discharge of nerve cells in the brain.
Referred to as an episode, the seizure is a direct
consequence of the exquisite regulation of neuronal excitation in the human
brain. Simply, epilepsy can occur with the body's inability to maintain
physiologic regulation. This regulation is essential to the complex functions of
the
evolved brain. There are, unfortunately, a number of factors
that can tip the balance of excitability toward abnormal neuronal discharge. In
a given individual, the occurrence of a single seizure can result from a variety
of influences or triggering factors, including traumatic head injury, excess
sensory stimulation, acute systemic metabolic disturbance, excessive loss of
sleep, substance abuse or a combination of these factors.
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders.
Approximately 7 percent of the American population, or more than 15 million
people, will experience at least one convulsion, or epileptic seizure in their
lifetime. Recurrent seizures, which is the criterion for a diagnosis of
epilepsy, have been estimated to occur in approximately two percent of the human
population. Genetic factors are responsible for an increased risk in siblings
and offspring of individuals with non-traumatic epilepsy. Whether or not such
events will lead to epilepsy depends upon the predisposition to this disorder in
a given individual. However, severe or chronic metabolic disturbances of brain
insult from head injury or tumors can also lead to the eventual development of
epilepsy, with or without this genetic influence.
There are many seizure types and varying degrees of severity
of affliction in the epileptic population. The categories are determined by
clinical manifestation and EEG discharge. They range from generalized epilepsy
with clinical manifestations involving the entire individual to several
categories of partial epilepsy, of which the most common are partial-complex
seizures, and simple motor seizures. The site and spread of abnormal discharge
will determine the behavioral expression of this disorder, a fact that results
in a diversity of epileptic manifestations. For example, in a more severe form
of epilepsy, such as grand mal seizure, the individual suddenly loses
consciousness with little warning, experiences generalized stiffness with muscle
spasm followed by relaxation of some muscles thus producing jerking of the
limbs, accompanied by sweating, rapid heart rate, rise in blood pressure,
dilation of pupils and biting of the tongue from jaw clenching .In contrast, in
a less severe form of epilepsy, such as a petit mal seizure (commonly referred
to as "absence"), the individual experiences a cessation of activity, momentary
disturbance of consciousness, slight movement, resuming activity without
awareness of interruption.
Since epilepsy arises from an excitatory threshold
disturbance in the brain, any factor that can, alter the excitatory regulation
of the brain can influence the probability of seizure occurrence. Traditionally,
medical efforts to influence this excitatory threshold have relied on the
neurochemical effects of anticonvulsant drugs. Unfortunately, however, these
drugs are nonspecific, and can produce changes in the brain or other body
tissues leading to undesirable and even dangerous side effects.
Some 25 year ago researchers at UCLA found that cats and monkeys could learn
to voluntarily change their brain wave patterns (electroencephalogram or EEG)
when food rewards were provided for these changes. This process is called
"operant conditioning" and is used to increase the occurrence of selected
responses in behavioral research. In this application it was used to increase an
EEG pattern called the sensorimotor rhythm, or SMR, which is associated with the
suppression of movements. Because these same animals were being used in studies
of seizure induction, it was accidentally discovered that this training produced
resistance to seizures elicited by convulsive drugs. In untrained animals these
drugs increased motor excitability and suppressed the SMR pattern in the EEG,
while in trained animals this effect was delayed and in some instances
completely blocked. A series of studies focusing on the physiology of the SMR
shows that this EEG pattern was, indeed, related to a reduction in motor
excitability, both at the level of the brain and along the conduction pathways
between muscles and the brain. Since epileptics with motor seizures show reduced
and/or disrupted SMR patterns, presumably related to abnormal motor
excitability, it was suggested that normalization of these EEG patterns through
feedback training might reduce this excitability and raise the threshold for
seizures in human beings.
Several decades of both animal and human research have established clearly
that EEG feedback training can produce functional changes in the brain which can
alter susceptibility to seizures. The first attempt at SMR feedback training in
a human epileptic by Sterman's group in 1972 achieved significant enhancement of
the SMR pattern together with a dramatic reduction in major-motor seizures. With
extended training this patient's seizures were sufficiently controlled to
warrant issuance of a California drivers license. This work was followed by
expanded studies in many laboratories that include "placebo" conditions and
added training for the suppression of abnormal EEG frequencies as well as
enhancement of the SMR. Normalization of the EEG and significant seizure
reduction were associated exclusively with non-placebo EEG feedback training.
Today, advances in computerized EEG technology have made delivery of this
adjunctive therapy for epilepsy both easier and more effective. Sophisticated
software programs provide comprehensive EEG analysis for the clinician and
flexible training strategies for self-regulation of electrical activity of the
brain by the individual. Further, these concepts and methods have been extended
to the treatment of other neurological disorders where abnormal EEG patterns can
be identified and manipulated.
Experience and studies indicate that this therapy modality is not for
everyone. Studies have shown that outcomes vary as a function of seizure type
and severity, intelligence, and social adjustment. Generalized motor, focal
motor, and partial-complex seizures with more manifestations respond best.
Effective EEG feedback training probably depends on
a gradual,
learned alteration of underlying neural regulation. Achieving successful
outcomes with this treatment approach requires a serious and sustained effort by
the individual. As with medication, good mental and social competence are
associated with better results. Successful patients are those who are best able
to immerse themselves effectively in the task, and to achieve awareness and
control of physiological process. Properly approached and applied this must be a
simple skill, since cats seem quite competent to learn EEG regulation.
Finley, W.W., Smith, H.A. & Etherton, M.D. (1975).
Reduction of seizures and normalization of the EEC, in a severe epileptic
following sensorimotor biofeedback training: Preliminary study.
Biological Psychology,
2, 189-203.
Fischer-Williams, M. & Clifford, B.C. (1988). Biofeedback
treatment of patients with seizuresa pilot-study of EEG feedback.
Electraencephalography and Clinical
Neuroplrysiology, M1), 18.
Lantz, D. and Sterman, M.B.
(1988). Neuropsychological assessment of subjects with uncontrolled epilepsy:
Effects of EEG
feedback training.
Epilepsia,
29(2), 163-171.
Lubar, J.F., and Bahler, W.W. (1976). Behavioral
management of epileptic seizures following biofeedback training of the
sensorimotor rhythm.
Biofeedback and
Self-Regulation, 1, 77-104.
Lubar, J.F., Shabsin, H.S., Natelson, S.E., Holder, G.S.,
Whitsett, S.F., Pamplin, W.E., and Krulikowski, D.1. (1981). EEG operant
conditioning in intractable epileptics.
Archives oj'Neurology, 38,
700-704.
Sterman, M.B. and Friar, L.R. (1972). Suppression of seizures in an
epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training.
Elecxroencephalograplty and Clinical
Neurophysiology, 33, 89-95.
Sterman, h4.B. and Macdonald, L.R. (1978). Effects of central cortical
EEG feedback training on incidence of poorly controlled seizures.
Epilepsia, 19,
207-222.
Sterman, M.B., Macdonald, L.R. and Stone, R.K. (1974). Biofeedback
training of the sensorimotor EEG rhythm in man: Effects on epilepsy.
Epilepsia, 15,
395-416.
Sterman, 1sf.B. (1986). Epilepsy and its treatment with EEC, feedback
therapy. Annals nf' Behavioral
Medicine, 8(1), 21-25.
Tozzo, C.A., Elfner, L.F., & May, J.G., Jr. (1988). EEG biofeedback and
relaxation training in the control of epileptic .
seizures. International Journal o/ Psychophysiology, 6(3),
185-194.
Wyler, A.R., Robbins, C.A. and Dodrill, C.B. (1979). EEG operant
conditioning for control of epilepsy. Ehpilepsia,
20, 279-286.
Psychologists Baltimore, Maryland
Marriage Counseling Baltimore Maryland
Family Counseling Baltimore, Maryland
Mental Health Baltimore, Maryland
..
..
|